data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/abcfd/abcfd477fd17aa1e7ab9e5a227fbd6b4f15376c9" alt="The visual minutes are a hand drawn illustration in pink and white. In the middle of the page is a large circle with white text, which asks the question from the session. It says: “The question that brought us here: How can we work together to make our Culture Collective more than the sum of its parts?”. The remainder of the illustration captures the key points from the session which are, in the order that they appear on the illustration: Community Arts as a sector, can it be a political force for good? There's an illustration of a walking boot with the words ‘boots on the ground’. It says it's about building relationships, and impact takes time. Culture is not only big theatres and institutions. Let's take pride in community arts, artists are in the community, and there is a capture of key words which are community, culture and health. The next section asks ‘whose interests are served?’ It looks at things like focus groups, taster sessions, artists, steering groups, community steering groups, and finding value more than solutions. Many people are at the intersection of many communities. And there's an illustration of a diverse collection of people. The next section is headlined urban versus rural. And it says ‘it's more fluid and complex than that, it's a spectrum’. It asks us to tackle assumptions about urban access, and rural “lack” (in inverted commas), and the historical expertise within communities. It notes that not everything should be about bringing the city to the countryside. And that provision should be more accountable to the public. Our lives don't look like maps. The next section looks at how to support artists at the end of this project with resources, not just with money, and asks “how do these 18 months inform ongoing infrastructure?” It notes parity of experience is important, particularly around digital poverty, and notes,this should be more than a hashtag. We want to move from inspired conversation to imperfect action, building geographic connections. Some of those connections might be around coordinators and managers or those who are starting up, the illustration wonders whether a weekly 15 minute catch up would make people feel welcomed, and notes that we should be aware of our wider network. We looked at funding, and asked how to show local non-arts partners the value of this work - and to not only ask for funding in relationship building. There was a conversation around toolkits, noting That The Best You Can Be? There is a compass of values and participatory practice and notes that Culture Collective is a road test. And that there could be co-training on using any toolkit that emerges. It discusses rules or guides for engagement specific to the sector. And asks “Who values the process?”, or “How do we measure success?” There's a quote from someone who attended saying “This is nourishing, I'm leaving more connected”. Next we talked about expectations and framing - acknowledging the power dynamics within the room and asked “Is this a ‘change the world’ project or a short constrained project?” And we noted that that's okay too. The final section touches on evaluation and asks “What is enough? What is too much?” And that evaluation should not only be providing a service to a third party, but should be helping people understand process and meaning to give tools to the community and to collect the magic moments. And there's an illustration of people holding campaign-style banners that read “We know what we want”."
Open Space Event 1 – Building Our Network
Click here to listen to an audio version of this page.
Throughout the Culture Collective’s first eighteen months, we plan to hold a series of Open Space events, facilitated by our friends at Improbable. These events are designed to build connections across the network, find areas of common interest, and act as a means to share insight and challenges.
Open Space events do not have a set agenda. On the day, participants self-organise to create their own agenda, allowing a dynamic and immediate response to the issues at hand. Any participant can timetable a topic (or “call a session”) on something that they want to work on and nothing is out of bounds. Once all the topics are timetabled, participants move into smaller, flexible breakout groups and get to work on the things that they feel most passionate about.
Our first Open Space event was held in July 2021, and centred around an exploration of how we turn a series of projects into a collective, or a network, asking:
“How can we work together to make our Culture Collective more than the sum of its parts?”
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3d5f5/3d5f58a96cbf45b153dee941ea5b8595f0f93795" alt="The visual minutes are a hand drawn illustration in pink and white. In the middle of the page is a large circle with white text, which asks the question from the session. It says: “The question that brought us here: How can we work together to make our Culture Collective more than the sum of its parts?”. The remainder of the illustration captures the key points from the session which are, in the order that they appear on the illustration: Community Arts as a sector, can it be a political force for good? There's an illustration of a walking boot with the words ‘boots on the ground’. It says it's about building relationships, and impact takes time. Culture is not only big theatres and institutions. Let's take pride in community arts, artists are in the community, and there is a capture of key words which are community, culture and health. The next section asks ‘whose interests are served?’ It looks at things like focus groups, taster sessions, artists, steering groups, community steering groups, and finding value more than solutions. Many people are at the intersection of many communities. And there's an illustration of a diverse collection of people. The next section is headlined urban versus rural. And it says ‘it's more fluid and complex than that, it's a spectrum’. It asks us to tackle assumptions about urban access, and rural “lack” (in inverted commas), and the historical expertise within communities. It notes that not everything should be about bringing the city to the countryside. And that provision should be more accountable to the public. Our lives don't look like maps. The next section looks at how to support artists at the end of this project with resources, not just with money, and asks “how do these 18 months inform ongoing infrastructure?” It notes parity of experience is important, particularly around digital poverty, and notes,this should be more than a hashtag. We want to move from inspired conversation to imperfect action, building geographic connections. Some of those connections might be around coordinators and managers or those who are starting up, the illustration wonders whether a weekly 15 minute catch up would make people feel welcomed, and notes that we should be aware of our wider network. We looked at funding, and asked how to show local non-arts partners the value of this work - and to not only ask for funding in relationship building. There was a conversation around toolkits, noting That The Best You Can Be? There is a compass of values and participatory practice and notes that Culture Collective is a road test. And that there could be co-training on using any toolkit that emerges. It discusses rules or guides for engagement specific to the sector. And asks “Who values the process?”, or “How do we measure success?” There's a quote from someone who attended saying “This is nourishing, I'm leaving more connected”. Next we talked about expectations and framing - acknowledging the power dynamics within the room and asked “Is this a ‘change the world’ project or a short constrained project?” And we noted that that's okay too. The final section touches on evaluation and asks “What is enough? What is too much?” And that evaluation should not only be providing a service to a third party, but should be helping people understand process and meaning to give tools to the community and to collect the magic moments. And there's an illustration of people holding campaign-style banners that read “We know what we want”."
▴ Open Space illustration by Blanche Ellis
Our Open Space events are illustrated by artist Blanche Ellis (an audio description of the illustration is also available). The illustration is shared here to offer an insight into the interest and priorities of the network, and to act as an open invitation for those exploring areas of common interest. Key themes that emerged include:
- A recognition of the different contexts we’re working in, and an openness to finding connections – and complexities or contradictions – in our experiences.
- Unpacking notions of ‘community’; exploring how we all sit in multiple communities, and play different roles in each of them.
- A curiosity about what our projects might have in common, and languages, toolkits and approaches that we might share.
- A long-term commitment to this work, taking our time to build relationships, move one step at a time, reflecting, refining, and reconsidering as we go.
- A commitment to look after one another as we go.